By Michael Reeves — Director, Eyes in the Sky
The math is the proof.
Facebook sent me a notification offering to “boost” one of my posts for $21 — promising I would reach up to 17 additional people. Let that sink in: an account that has historically reached millions is being told it must pay $21 to reach 17 people — more than a dollar per person. That is not a glitch. That is not a mistake. That is throttling by another name.
For months — years — I have documented the exact same pattern across multiple platforms: content that goes viral is immediately frozen; impressions spike and then vanish; overseas supporters tell me posts are suddenly invisible in their countries. One post hit 30,071 views and 330 interactions within 24 hours, then collapsed to under 50 views in subsequent days. Fans from Asia, India, Africa, and Europe called to say the post was ghosted. The analytics, the witness calls, and the distribution graphs are all consistent: my content is being suppressed.
This is not merely an attack on one man’s visibility. This is an attack on free expression and on the commercial viability of independent creators. I am producing a documentary — Eyes in the Sky — built from live footage that documents surveillance, harassment, and platform censorship. Investor interest and distribution deals hinge on demonstrable public traction. When the platforms artificially choke off reach, they destroy the lifeblood of that project and of any independent creator trying to be heard.
Who benefits from silencing a story? Who pays the people who follow, harass, and block distribution? This is not random. This is funded, coordinated, and purposeful. I have asked repeatedly: who are the funders? Who are the contractors? How does a private citizen become the target of sustained, well-funded suppression? The answers matter — to me, to the investors I am meeting with, and to the public.
I also want to be absolutely clear: political violence and the targeting of people for their views have no place in our society. I condemn violence of any kind. Freedom of speech is not an exclusive right that applies only to viewpoints we like — it is fundamental, and it must apply to everyone, even those whose views we disagree with. The balance of justice must apply equally. If it does not, we are failing as a nation.
Therefore, I am calling for immediate action:
Meta / Facebook must explain: publish a full account of why posts from my account are being flagged, throttled, or offered “boosts” with insulting reach estimates. The $21-for-17-people notice is not just insulting — it is evidence that an automated system or deliberate policy is preventing normal organic reach.
Law enforcement oversight: I ask the U.S. Department of Justice (Civil Rights Division) and relevant federal authorities to investigate who is funding the harassment and the on-the-ground operations that follow and silence targeted individuals. If contractors or private security companies are being paid to follow, intimidate, or suppress, that must be uncovered.
Congressional and regulator attention: platform transparency is long overdue. Algorithms that control who is seen and who is erased affect elections, commerce, and safety. We need transparency audits and mandatory reporting of content moderation and reach-limiting practices.
Journalists and investigators: if you are willing to review analytics, raw footage, and witness statements, please contact me. This is time-sensitive — investor confidence and the documentary’s future depend on demonstrating that the suppression is real and systemic.
Public solidarity: if this post is visible to you, share it. Replicate screenshots, post the video elsewhere, and help build a public record that cannot be erased.
The platforms like to treat reach as an abstract “algorithm” problem. But there’s nothing abstract about losing your voice, your livelihood, or your ability to show traction to investors because a few companies decide to choke your distribution. If one person reads this and shares the evidence, the case becomes stronger. The truth will get out.
Eyes in the Sky is not just a title. It is a reality — and I will keep documenting it until the world sees what has been done in plain sight.
— BOY Jerry
Director, Eyes in the Sky
2 people like this
Nicely put! I feel that way, too. My Mum named me after the violet/pansy flowers that grow year-round. Otherwise she would've named me Nastaran which means "wild rose." Growing up in Canada almost eve...
Expand commentNicely put! I feel that way, too. My Mum named me after the violet/pansy flowers that grow year-round. Otherwise she would've named me Nastaran which means "wild rose." Growing up in Canada almost everyone I met mispronounced Banafsheh (even other Iranians got it wrong lol calling me entirely different names like Shabnam ["dew"] or Shukufeh ["blossom"]) and many still do, but now I wear it with pride and even find myself gravitating towards purple things more often as a nod to it. The names for my characters I put a lot of thought into, sometimes it's by meaning (like Keziah because naming her Cinna for "cinnamon" didn't quite work) and other times by sound (like Yini since no matter what I wanted the same vowel sounds, and it was extremely lucky that's a real Chinese name lol). It's even better when characters have two canon names like many of them in Petal do lol
2 people like this
Banafsheh Esmailzadeh, you have grown into your name. Apparently, your characters have done the same. The funny thing is that I do not give any real thought to the names of the characters I create. Fo...
Expand commentBanafsheh Esmailzadeh, you have grown into your name. Apparently, your characters have done the same. The funny thing is that I do not give any real thought to the names of the characters I create. For my animated series What the Mack? I immediately knew the names of each character. Zero thought put into it and zero changes. Maybe it has something to do with creative synesthesia.