I’m in a group. I may not be there much longer because the creator of the group states things I don’t agree with. Now he has more experience than me working on films that didn’t seem to make a profit but he’s had the opportunities. I think he talks mainly to sell his services as someone who can build you a business plan and charge you money for your dreams.
Anyone can build a business plan. Anyone can build a shooting schedule. Anyone can build a budget. It’s not that hard. It’s easier if have software that helps you out, but if you can’t afford it, it’s not impossible.
Now I’m kind of a maverick because I think the budget breakdowns are wrong. Above The Line, Below The Line, to me is kind of like a game of 52 Pick-up. I break things down into three lists. Cast, crew and equipment. Now this guy says every page of your screenplay has a cost but that’s not really accurate. Every day has a cost. It’s not constant. You have everyday costs that are a constant but a day a filming where you only have two cast members as opposed to six will take different costs to pull off. Kno9w who you need for the day you’ve planned.
He talks about Schedule F casts. I think I know what the “F” stands for. The definition of Schedule F is roughly stated as, “As opposed to a daily or weekly contract, SAG Schedule F deals are usually reserved for lead or supporting actors who are needed for the entire run of a given project.” Why is this different? It doesn’t make sense. It’s a scam. Why would you hire an actor to play the lead of your project if he didn’t intend to be in the whole film? Why are we, the creatives, who build stories for these overvalued talents so they can have employment, subject to these stupid scams? If I owned a hardware store and I hired someone to work there, do I have to put him on a Schedule F to make sure he shows up to work? Wow! Why does SAG even have SAG scale for films with a budget of $2m or above if you can’t rely on the talent to bother to stick around until the film is in the can? SAG is not that far off from being an extortion racket.
You need sales projections. Projections are crap. That’s crystal ball garbage. I’ve looked at the formulas. They look impressive, but they can’t calculate accurate projections. Investors still rely on these fictitious numbers. Focus on goals. While theaters are still a possible avenue of revenue, no matter what your genre is, your goal should be to get your film in at least 1,500 screens out of the 39,000 movie screens across America. Aim everything on those targets. Make a great film that is universally enjoyed by a majority of the general public. Make sure every frame is as close to a work of art as possible. Execute the bests of your talents no matter how limited your resources are. The rest is a con.
4 people like this
A $100 million pool for indie films would be incredible for creatives and the NY economy, Richard "RB" Botto! NY has so much talent. I hope the proposal passes. More indie films!
3 people like this
RB, that’s very good news for the Indie Films in New York! Will help with the pricey location! Additionally, it can help my screenplay because I have scenes set in New York. Thanks for sharing the hope :)
4 people like this
It's a smart add on many levels. Much, much different than how Cali approached it.
3 people like this
There is so much to like about this proposal from the extension to 2036, the workforce development commitment, the bipartisan support, the extra juice for filming outside the city to encourage growth....
Expand commentThere is so much to like about this proposal from the extension to 2036, the workforce development commitment, the bipartisan support, the extra juice for filming outside the city to encourage growth. There is competition in New Jersey and New York is smart to fight for their significant place in the industry. New York has always been a great indie film hub and should be a big part of the new wave of indie film production supporting emerging filmmakers, companies and economic models. Agreed that this is a smart apprach and great optics for the state's production community.
1 person likes this
All great points, Sam Sokolow. Also, IMO, a shot directly at the heart of Hollywood and the Band-Aid on a wound expansion proposal they recently pushed forth.