PART 1 — BEFORE PLOT: WHAT TRUTH DOES THE STORY REFUSE TO LET THE PROTAGONIST AVOID?
Most writers start with what happens.
Upstream writers start with what cannot be escaped.
Every story enforces a truth the protagonist has been avoiding. When you name that truth before outlining anything, three things happen:
- the character’s arc becomes inevitable
- the conflict stops drifting and starts tightening
- the plot becomes a pressure system instead of a sequence of events
A story doesn’t reveal truth.
A story corners it.
Once you define the truth your story refuses to let the protagonist avoid, the entire narrative architecture stabilizes.
PART 2 — BEFORE PLOT: WHAT PRESSURE DOES THE WORLD APPLY THAT THE CHARACTER CAN’T NEGOTIATE WITH?
Plot is not movement — plot is pressure.
Upstream writers identify the pressure the world applies that the protagonist cannot charm, outthink, or sidestep. This pressure is what forces identity to break, bend, or transform.
Define it early:
- the rule the world enforces without apology
- the cost that rises every time the protagonist hesitates
- the boundary the story will not let them cross without consequence
When the world’s pressure is clear, the plot stops being a list of events and becomes a governing condition.
PART 3 — BEFORE PLOT: WHAT BEHAVIOR MUST THE STORY MAKE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE ARC TO RESOLVE?
A character arc isn’t about what the protagonist learns.
It’s about what the story removes from their behavioral options.
Upstream writers define the behavior the story must make impossible:
- the coping mechanism that can’t survive the climax
- the identity mask that collapses under pressure
- the emotional shortcut the story refuses to allow
- the pattern that must break for resolution to mean anything
When you identify the behavior your story makes impossible, the arc becomes structural, not sentimental.
This is how a story stops reacting to the protagonist and starts shaping them.
2 people like this
Maybe it's time for a POC?
3 people like this
Proof of concept.
2 people like this
Might be a good thing.
4 people like this
I like the POC idea.
At worst, the scores you listed make for a solid query letter You have a portfolio, some credible evidence to suggest your writing voice translates, now seems a good time for repr...
Expand commentI like the POC idea.
At worst, the scores you listed make for a solid query letter You have a portfolio, some credible evidence to suggest your writing voice translates, now seems a good time for representation? Also, have you built any supporting media for your scripts? i.e posters, look and feel mood boards, treatments, etc to include in a pitch deck? I mean what if you landed a meeting tomorrow, are you ready to pitch these 3 scripts? Are you ready if someone asks "what else have you got?" Congrats and continued good luck
An alert re Greenlight: GL came up with a list of suggested actors for my screenplay.. Suggested a 4 year-old female actress for the role of a 15 year-old boy. THIS IS THE DESCRIPTION IN THE SCREENPLA...
Expand commentAn alert re Greenlight: GL came up with a list of suggested actors for my screenplay.. Suggested a 4 year-old female actress for the role of a 15 year-old boy. THIS IS THE DESCRIPTION IN THE SCREENPLAY A boy (STEVIE) about fifteen years old, in jacket, jeans, alarms begin wailing.
This raises doubts about the rest of the review process. GL's response when I pointed out the problem: 'If you don't find the casting suggestions to be to your liking, I'd suggest using the Pencil tool and add additional context to the report section.' AND 'We will reimburse you for the tokens you utilize in the process.'
ChatGPT commented on this situation: ' If you followed Greenlight’s suggestion literally:
• Casting conversations would stall
• Producers would question script comprehension
• Funding assessors would lose confidence
• The note would quietly be discounted '
So I cancelled GL and received a refund.
BEWARE.