This is more a thought than an actionable item.
We see someone get a shock from an outlet as a child. Perhaps we are scared of that room, or of holding a fork. Because the shock happened in a particular room and the person stuck a fork in the socket.
But that is an understanding based purely on observation. But what we learn is that electric can be dangerous and must be treated with caution.
So when we read some bad writing and it is full of stupid errors. Just removing those perceived errors doesn’t means it is good. It was bad with errors, it is now bad without those errors.
Look at the cause of things. Like people say “look at the note under the note”. What made someone feel that way? What makes this story crap, I guarantee it isn’t the existence of a phrase or wording in a sentence.
Look at the underlying things, not the surface level things. This is very hard and what learning the craft actually is.
Like said, not directly actionable, like removing words ending in “ing”, which isn’t a thing.