I was taught to give every character a name, JANE as opposed to LANDLORD, however small. This seems cumbersome though, and really, really over the top. What's the current line people are drawing?
Who taught you that? And what was their argument? The most important thing is readability. How does it add to readability to have my one-off character described as JOE rather than MECHANIC? HAKIRA rather than MASKED NINJA?
I've read in the "Screenwriter's Bible" by Dave Trottier and in a few other places that if it's a lead or a major supporting character, give him/her a name, but if it's a minor character that's only in one scene, a generic name such as "Landlord", "Hot Dog Vendor" or whatever their job or situation is, that's fine, or if they're multiple, minor characters such as "Cop 1", "Cop 2", etc.
@Kerry -- Screenwriter's conference MANY YEARS AGO. The advice never struck me as good advice. Especially if that character is unknown to my hero/protag.
I can appreciate all points made. I approach this subject from the POV of an actor... Let me 1st say that while I am a writer, producer & director, I was & am an actor 1st. In all aspect of production, I look at all matters from all points of view - especially when they involve the talent. With that, for a screenwriter, it is easier to list a title, ie "LANDLORD" - no specific name(s). For an actor, it helps - me anyway - to have something more to go on. A name would serve that. Being a "JANE" will get a better performance than "LANDLORD". If the character's name is "LANDLORD", perhaps this a discussion the director should have with the actor... I hope you all are well!
I really think this is a matter of preference. I wouldn't give a name to the generic server character at McDonald's whose only line is "do you want fries with that?" but I have no issue naming a character I know won't appear again, if s/he has a number of lines in a scene. I don't spend hours coming up with perfect name - it will be something like Boss Todd or Co-Worker Jim - but I like to give even the smaller characters a bit of personality. I also do what Alan said above, Grumpy Landlord or Aggravating Shopper or what have you. I recently read a script where characters who had chunks of dialogue had no names; didn't like that at all.
4 people like this
Who taught you that? And what was their argument? The most important thing is readability. How does it add to readability to have my one-off character described as JOE rather than MECHANIC? HAKIRA rather than MASKED NINJA?
3 people like this
I've read in the "Screenwriter's Bible" by Dave Trottier and in a few other places that if it's a lead or a major supporting character, give him/her a name, but if it's a minor character that's only in one scene, a generic name such as "Landlord", "Hot Dog Vendor" or whatever their job or situation is, that's fine, or if they're multiple, minor characters such as "Cop 1", "Cop 2", etc.
@Kerry -- Screenwriter's conference MANY YEARS AGO. The advice never struck me as good advice. Especially if that character is unknown to my hero/protag.
1 person likes this
I can appreciate all points made. I approach this subject from the POV of an actor... Let me 1st say that while I am a writer, producer & director, I was & am an actor 1st. In all aspect of production, I look at all matters from all points of view - especially when they involve the talent. With that, for a screenwriter, it is easier to list a title, ie "LANDLORD" - no specific name(s). For an actor, it helps - me anyway - to have something more to go on. A name would serve that. Being a "JANE" will get a better performance than "LANDLORD". If the character's name is "LANDLORD", perhaps this a discussion the director should have with the actor... I hope you all are well!
2 people like this
Erick, if you ever see the person who threw up that advice again, kick them in the throat for me.
2 people like this
I will sometimes give minor characters an adjective to go along with their label. Grumpy Landlord, Angry Man, Bratty Kid, Flustered Mom, etc.
Right on CJ
I really think this is a matter of preference. I wouldn't give a name to the generic server character at McDonald's whose only line is "do you want fries with that?" but I have no issue naming a character I know won't appear again, if s/he has a number of lines in a scene. I don't spend hours coming up with perfect name - it will be something like Boss Todd or Co-Worker Jim - but I like to give even the smaller characters a bit of personality. I also do what Alan said above, Grumpy Landlord or Aggravating Shopper or what have you. I recently read a script where characters who had chunks of dialogue had no names; didn't like that at all.