While developing my current screenplay, I’ve been thinking a lot about the role of ambiguity in storytelling.
In many scripts, everything is explained very clearly, but I’m increasingly interested in stories where some elements remain uncertain. Not because the screenwriter doesn’t know the answer, but because that uncertainty becomes part of the experience for the audience.
In psychological storytelling especially, ambiguity can create a deeper connection between the viewer and the characters. When the audience doesn’t receive all the answers, they start questioning what is real, what might be perception, and what might be something else entirely.
However, ambiguity only works when the emotional and narrative structure of the story is solid. If the characters, their motivations, and the dramatic progression are clear, the story can afford to leave certain aspects unresolved without feeling incomplete.
Personally, I see ambiguity not as a lack of explanation, but as a narrative tool that invites the audience to participate actively in the story. The key, in my opinion, is that the screenwriter must still understand the emotional truth of what is happening, even if the film chooses not to explain everything directly.
When used with intention, ambiguity doesn’t weaken a story — it deepens it.
What is your opinion about ambiguity?
I think dialogue-driven is still important this day, and I'm not denying it's true. However, I think it's better not to provide too much exposition for audience to sit back, and hear the whole yapping...
Expand commentI think dialogue-driven is still important this day, and I'm not denying it's true. However, I think it's better not to provide too much exposition for audience to sit back, and hear the whole yapping session. Depending on the genre and the story you're telling,
That's why I like to use the methods called "Show don't tell". It's the way provide the information through visual, body language, facial expressions, location, cinematography, camera movements, lighting, and colour psychological through costumes, and sometimes colour lighting.
The answer is best provided by research v. asking us. Take some time, dive into a little research and see what's out there. A better answer will be had.
Kelvin Bernards Great point, Kelvin. I completely agree that “show, don’t tell” is one of the most powerful tools in filmmaking. Even in dialogue-driven stories, the subtext, body language, and visual...
Expand commentKelvin Bernards Great point, Kelvin. I completely agree that “show, don’t tell” is one of the most powerful tools in filmmaking. Even in dialogue-driven stories, the subtext, body language, and visual storytelling can carry a lot of emotional weight. For me, the most interesting moments are when dialogue and visual cues work together to reveal what the characters are truly feeling. Thanks for sharing your perspective.
Lindbergh Hollingsworth That’s a fair pointresearch is definitely important. At the same time, I think conversations like this can also be useful because filmmakers and producers bring real industry p...
Expand commentLindbergh Hollingsworth That’s a fair pointresearch is definitely important. At the same time, I think conversations like this can also be useful because filmmakers and producers bring real industry perspectives that research alone sometimes can’t capture. I appreciate the suggestion though.
Blue Moon on Netflix is a great example of how it still works. That movie is nothing but dialogue. Of course it came from Richard Linklater who is famous for these sorts of films, but they still get made for sure! Rye Lane is another great example from a couple years ago.