Anamorphic is the rage. Every filmmaker I talk with wants to film in anamorphic, with anamorphic lenses, believing it gives their film a "cinematic" look. I have no issue with that, except when I shoot anamorphic, I use spherical lenses, but that's for another post.
But for anyone who started filming on 16mm, you know the 1.66:1 aspect ratio delivers a stylistic feeling that a wider aspect ratio leaves wanting. Despite film taking a backseat in lower-budget cinema over the last 15 years or so, this is an aspect ratio that has hung on, yet it isn't often discussed. But, if you look around, you'll see it is still employed by top filmmakers (check out recent films such as Scorsese's "The Irishman" and Yorgos Lanthimos' "Poor Things").
I recently interviewed for an upcoming horror feature where the director wants to harken back to an 80's feel, so we discussed using 1.66:1 to deliver that feel. The spaces we're looking at filming are confined, so why not make the aspect ratio fit the same bill?
It's a fun discussion to have and one that we'll continue to talk about but for now, I'd like to hear from you. How do you choose your aspect ratio? What considerations go into your decision? Are you a "wide-or-die" shooter or do you like to play around with the frame and delivery?
Let me know in the comments below!
1 person likes this
Thanks for sharing the interview, Michael Fitzer. Shasta Spahn talks about changing the past look in Yellowjackets. If I write a script that has two timelines, I'll figure out a way for the timelines...
Expand commentThanks for sharing the interview, Michael Fitzer. Shasta Spahn talks about changing the past look in Yellowjackets. If I write a script that has two timelines, I'll figure out a way for the timelines to look different so the reader won't be confused which timeline they're reading.
1 person likes this
Michael Fitzer, “Yellowjackets” is such a masterclass in balancing tone, tension, and visual language across timelines, and this ASC conversation is gold for anyone tackling dual-era storytelling. I e...
Expand commentMichael Fitzer, “Yellowjackets” is such a masterclass in balancing tone, tension, and visual language across timelines, and this ASC conversation is gold for anyone tackling dual-era storytelling. I especially loved how they kept each timeline visually distinct without making the show feel disconnected. That level of cohesion is so hard to pull off and really elevates the series. It's been one of my favorite series over the last few years and I finally forced my husband to sit down and binge it all with me before starting season 3 so we can watch it together now.
1 person likes this
I’m a huge fan of Yellowjackets—the way they balance the dual timelines is masterful. I really admire how the cinematography subtly distinguishes the two periods without making it feel like you're swi...
Expand commentI’m a huge fan of Yellowjackets—the way they balance the dual timelines is masterful. I really admire how the cinematography subtly distinguishes the two periods without making it feel like you're switching shows. It’s a great lesson in visual consistency while still conveying time and tone.