Screenwriting : Dialogue and implied action. Is the action line necessary? by Alan B. Cox

Alan B. Cox

Dialogue and implied action. Is the action line necessary?

Whit gives Jim a list.

                Whit

  Jim.  Here's the list.

Do I need the action line?  Or is it implied that she gave him the list?

"Whit gives Jim the list."

Chad Stroman

One or the other but not both normally IMHO. Otherwise it's duplicating what is already known or implied.

Either:

Whit gives Jim a list. Jim looks it over.

or

WHIT

Jim, here's the list.

UNLESS it's introducing a new unknown item.

Ex: Whit enters, crosses to Jim and hands him a clipboard.

WHIT

The ratings from last night.

OR:

Whit enters, crosses to Jim and hands him a clipboard.

JIM

What's this?

WHIT

That's the list of our agents in Instanbul compromised due to the leak.

Anthony Lucas

I like the 3rd option Chad

Anthony Lucas

so, really say and show it is the way to go?

Chad Stroman

Dan Guardino Laura Scheiner What both Dan and Laura said is best practice.

Steve Brumwell

don't need the dialogue

Doug Nelson

A simple INSERT or a CU could do the job.

Alan B. Cox

In this case I need the dialogue. I'll leave the action line out. Jim really wasn't expecting a list, and to leave the dialogue out would make the scene longer (trying to make it shorter). He would have to comment and she would have to respond. (boring!) I learn it from y'all. As always, Thank you.

Doug Nelson

That dialog is on the nose - cut it.

Pablo Diablo

Action can stay intact. What you could do is this:

Whit

(re: list)

"Here you go, Jim."

Would that work for you? Unless they don't have a good relationship, then he just hands the list and exits...

Other topics in Screenwriting:

register for stage 32 Register / Log In