I didn't make any list in my script submission. But the underlying tones of the review was positive.
In response I wrote the following to Nick who obviously doesn't read his email messages, but only sends out marketing emails by the thousands:
"In my review notes for my female driven script, I notice the reader was a person
in the UK. Do you have a non-disclosure agreement with the readers? How do I know that some form of plagiarism might or might not happen with the material I submitted? Themes, ideas, plots etc. or even actual text may be involved.
Also I noticed the reader did not put the script title in the title space of the review document that I received in the email.
Does that mean something? Also the name of the reader was not noted, only the qualifications. May I have her/his name for my information?
Frankly I was immensely pleased with the underlying tone of the review. I know that my script touches upon many issues and topics and that it is extremely difficult to assess and eventually produce. I also know that it offers a lot of "material" for consideration and eventual production. It is not an easy project, as there are many cultural divides and uniquenesses which brings us to the topic of audiences. I also realize that "formatting" is important.
I may also point out that "The Poisoned Dart" is one of three possible related scripts that may emanate from my book, "The Three Verbs of Being" and from which it borrows some unique spiritual, cultural and colonial ideas.
My beliefs and writings are based on The Principle of Feminine Spiritual Primacy, a vast subject area from which an infinite number of themes may be derived. Ripe for the plucking!
It is indeed a very difficult project. And, I can use all the help I can get.
And for me, time is of the essence as I turn 96 on December 10, 2024. But I still do write creatively and profusely.
Remember it took Attenborough over 12 years to put "Gandhi" on the big screen."
Has anyone heard of The Principle of Feminine Spiritual Primacy?
